AI-Assisted Workflows: Where It Works (and Where It Doesn't)
What Works
Predictive maintenance: Sensors predict failures weeks ahead. 20-30% cost reduction, 15-25% downtime reduction.
Quality detection: Computer vision identifies defects better than humans. 5-15% detection improvement, 30-50% time savings.
Production scheduling: AI optimizes sequences across machines. 5-20% throughput, 10-15% setup reduction.
Demand forecasting: ML predicts demand better than historical averages. 10-30% accuracy improvement, 15-25% inventory reduction.
What Struggles
Highly variable products: Custom items need engineering judgment, not pattern matching. ML models need thousands of examples; you have dozens.
Troubleshooting: Requires understanding your specific context. AI trained on generic data misses facility-specific factors.
Safety decisions: Can't use probabilistic AI where errors injure people. Human expertise is non-negotiable.
Strategic decisions: Future conditions are unpredictable. Scenario planning beats historical data analysis.
The Framework
Ask: Can AI access the signal? Is there a clear right answer? Is there enough data? What's the cost of error? Will humans actually review recommendations?
If the answers are yes, AI can help. Otherwise, use domain expertise.
More articles
Why Your Manufacturing Software Fails Without Offline-First Design
Cloud-only applications fail on the factory floor. Learn why offline-first architecture is critical for manufacturing software.
The True Cost of Manual Shop Floor Data Entry
Manual data entry on the factory floor wastes time, introduces errors, and obscures cost. Calculate the real impact.